|
Post by steelers1954 on Dec 5, 2018 21:38:59 GMT -5
So either way in 2 season everyone will be evaluated then Yes that's what needs to be done..
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Dec 5, 2018 21:44:18 GMT -5
If going to adjust player values, I'd say the fairest way to do so for parity would be this: When a player is in the red, OR if someone decides to trade player before in the red, said value of player should be adjusted accordingly before trade is made. This way, people still get to be rewarded with good value on drafting skills while players are still on their team, and also discourages anyone from trying to take advantage of that rule by trading away said player early. This could eliminate almost all of the parity issues, maybe even starting as early as this offseason going into next. Just a thought I think we should seriously consider. Can I please get some feedback on my idea? I honestly think this makes a lot of sense, is fair, and maybe the least complicated way to ultimately bring parity to the league. DirtyBird , indydave , craig440 , @njc71 , divebitch , danb6177 , packdog , Jeppers , steelers1954 I get it now, good idea
|
|
|
Post by indydave on Dec 10, 2018 15:35:14 GMT -5
I think this is a good idea, it does need to be refined first but the premise is good. - how will the values be adjusted? - at what point does a player qualify for readjustment? - what will be used to determine the adjusted rating? - when do I get my hat? lol
|
|
|
Post by indydave on Dec 10, 2018 18:21:00 GMT -5
What if we adjust the keeper rating based off of the ADP of the previous year? If the player gets adjusted every second year when if comes time to trade or drop, as Eddie suggested. I think this is fair. If you pick up a player off the WW and they finish inside the top 10. Why not give them a 2nd or 3rd round designation but ONLY if they are top 10 at their position.
Thoughts?
|
|