|
Post by Doc on Sept 8, 2018 12:09:30 GMT -5
There's a part of me that sorta liked something Packdog suggested about having to let players go back into the draft again when your time is up with them, instead of trading them.
I don't know if that would go over to well, and I'm sure we'd still have people trying to trade them ahead of time.
However, I do think that the draft value of players certainly shouldn't stay the same forever... that much is something that's been on my mind for awhile now... just not sure what the best solution is to that problem... but I DO believe that's something that NEEDS to be adjusted somehow.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Sept 8, 2018 12:29:14 GMT -5
is there a downside to changing the draft rankings( ) to start in round (4) instead of round (1)? The 1.1 draft becomes a 4.1 tag. and so on. I mean that seems like a pretty simple fix. My team is the worst and I feel like that's a fix to my team. Being able to keep my #1 overall pick which I cannot do the way its set up.
Does everyone understand what I am proposing? Or am I missing something obvious that sucks?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Sept 8, 2018 12:43:37 GMT -5
is there a downside to changing the draft rankings( ) to start in round (4) instead of round (1)? The 1.1 draft becomes a 4.1 tag. and so on. I mean that seems like a pretty simple fix. My team is the worst and I feel like that's a fix to my team. Being able to keep my #1 overall pick which I cannot do the way its set up. Does everyone understand what I am proposing? Or am I missing something obvious that sucks? It's sounds like a great suggestion to me.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Sept 8, 2018 12:48:54 GMT -5
is there a downside to changing the draft rankings( ) to start in round (4) instead of round (1)? The 1.1 draft becomes a 4.1 tag. and so on. I mean that seems like a pretty simple fix. My team is the worst and I feel like that's a fix to my team. Being able to keep my #1 overall pick which I cannot do the way its set up. Does everyone understand what I am proposing? Or am I missing something obvious that sucks? It's sounds like a great suggestion to me. Sometimes I don’t think about all the angles. And I miss something obvious. I would have been sitting pretty with fournette and Barkley.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Sept 8, 2018 12:54:34 GMT -5
Sometimes I don’t think about all the angles. And I miss something obvious. Well, that's why we're all here to collectively figure it out as a group, but I really do like the sound of that proposal. I would have been sitting pretty with fournette and Barkley. You sure would've, but you should still be sitting pretty once Ingram gets back from suspension hopefully.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Sept 8, 2018 12:58:09 GMT -5
Sometimes I don’t think about all the angles. And I miss something obvious. Well, that's why we're all here to collectively figure it out as a group, but I really do like the sound of that proposal. I would have been sitting pretty with fournette and Barkley. You sure would've, but you should still be sitting pretty once Ingram gets back from suspension hopefully. I think I will be too. At last at the RB position.
|
|
|
Post by steelers1954 on Sept 8, 2018 13:02:49 GMT -5
Does everyone understand what I am proposing? I'm not sure I get everything, but I do like the fact that you are making suggestions. The more we look at different ways the closer we get to finding something that just might work.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2018 13:07:19 GMT -5
I don't understand Dans idea at all. I thought the problem was guys having a late round tag when they are an early round talent? I havent read all of this yet because I'm lazy remember.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Sept 8, 2018 13:31:45 GMT -5
sent it to you in a pm craig as not to clutter this thread with a long post.
|
|
|
Post by Jeppers on Sept 8, 2018 15:32:32 GMT -5
I like Dans idea. I understand exactly what hes saying.
We are on the same page.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Sept 8, 2018 16:28:04 GMT -5
sent it to you in a pm craig as not to clutter this thread with a long post. You're not gonna clutter the thread. We won't even be using this thread soon...hopefully. Copy and paste your pm to craig if it explains in further detail. thx
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Sept 8, 2018 17:17:31 GMT -5
ok here is what I sent and what i propose. Lemme know what problems could arise
The problem I have is I cannot keep my 1st round pick, like fournette. Because then I lose my next season 1st round pick (which was barkley in this case). I cannot trade my first round pick for a top player because nobody wants to lose there next years first rounder. Ok Im sure you understand the problem.
So
If in this years draft we take the first round picks
Barkley, Green, Fournette, McCoy, Freeman, Gronk, Kelce, Evans and Hilton (Elliot would not count because he was a keeper)
and we give them a (4) tag. So why a 4 tag, well because in reality they are 4th round picks. we kept 40 players as keepers. So the guys going in the draft are not really first round guys. So we give them all a (4) making them tradable and keepable. This does not deplete anything because whoever is kept from these someone from the 40 gos back in so no worries there.
Then we continue with the second rounders and give them a (5) tag, The 3rd rounders get a (6) tag and so on. this would continue for the entire draft.
Then the following year if you keep barkley or another selected that round you lose your 4th round pick not your first round pick. So basically nobody can lose a first second or third round pick any more.
If this were implemented then everyone with a 1 2 or 3 tag from previous years would need to be changed to a 4 tag.
Make sense please lemme know if it does not, I run on sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Sept 8, 2018 18:33:44 GMT -5
I guess 1 issue could be that in 5 years there may be a lot of (4) tags
|
|
|
Post by steelers1954 on Sept 9, 2018 10:21:22 GMT -5
ok here is what I what I propose. I like what you & packdog have both said and I think I've come up with something that just might work. I made a list of RB's/WR's /TE's/ & QB's that have values that need adjusted,I think we all know who the players are so that's why I'M not going to list every player/position. It maybe a little more work for me but I'm up to it. Here's what I propose: After this season the player value will be adjusted to their actual worth, some examples:Antonio Brown 4th round, we all know he is a 1st to early 2nd at best so his new value will be a 1st round. Keenan Allen & Michael Thomas both carry 8th round tags that would be changed to a 2nd round which is where they should be. Russell Wilson 11th round, Cam Newton 12th round & Aaron Rodgers 7th round ,all these would be adjusted to their proper value. Let me make this clear everyone who made trades this off season for players will be able to keep them at the present value however once he must be traded or dropped their values will be adjusted before being traded to a new team. Also any players you drafted with low rounds will be able to be kept at the round you drafted them in until the need to be traded.
I think this would keep the draft pool with more talent and give everyone a fair chance at players they presently can't get.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Sept 9, 2018 10:55:30 GMT -5
I like that also steelers1954. What we should do is if anyone has a solution let it be know. Then we could number each solution and put them to vote. Not changing anything at all would also be a vote.
|
|